LES PRINCIPES DE BASE DE SLOW VS FAST THINKING

Les principes de base de slow vs fast thinking

Les principes de base de slow vs fast thinking

Blog Article



How ut we opt out of being unrelenting self righteous pricks? Well, we probably can’t fully, the gravity is just too strong. Escape velocity would require some fundamental redesigns to a cognitive apparatus which evolved to intuit a subset of phenomena on the African savanna which bore a relationship to our reproductive success.

” Sunk-cost thinking tells règles to stick with a bad investment parce que of the money we have already lost je it; to à l’usure année unappetizing auberge meal because, after all, we’re paying for it; to prosecute année unwinnable war parce que of the investment of blood and treasure. In all cases, this way of thinking is rubbish.

All that being said I do find the broad strokes of the system1/system2 département proposed in this book to Supposé que interesting and appealing. A small few of the examples were fun to contemplate, and it was okay. 3/5, aborting reading.

Psychology should inform the design of risk policies that astuce the exercé’ knowledge with the ouvert’s emotions and intuitions.

Next I will resort to recalling numerous studies which have totally pinastre-cushioned the quaint concept that we are dispassionate, logical thinkers. When, in fact, barring a commitment to scientific principles, we have strong intuitions that we seek to justify through means of strategic reasoning. “We’re more like lawyers than Vulcans.” I say solemnly. Starring hors champ into the espacement for dramatic effect.

We all Direct in a postmodernist, secular world now. When we come of age into that scenario, many of usages learn a bit of cautionnement. Unless this brutal coming of age makes usages hip and glib.

Answering année Easier Énigme (97). If Nous question is hard, we’ll substitute année easier one. It can be a good way to make decisions. Unless the easier Interrogation is not a good substitute. I have année uneasy awareness that I ut this. Especially since it often REALLY ANNOYS me when people do it to me.

So incensed by this needless dégât of literary property, I stood over the man and berated him nous the disposée of properly breaking in the spines of hardcovers. As he wormed embout in pepperoni and boisson gazeuse, nodding (if conscience no other reason than to avoid another risqué sounding of his sternum) I also took the time to explain the central lettre of this book:

In canevas order of complexity, here are thinking fast and slow daniel some examples of the automatic activities that are attributed to System 1:

Some of the 185 are dubious or trivial. The ikea effect, intuition instance, is defined as “the tendency intuition people to agora a disproportionately high value on objects that they partially assembled themselves.

Neither ut the author deems it expedient to overcome these biases, plaisant only to recognize them and put our system 2 to work before making capital judgments. I am afraid that this review is getting a bit too longiligne, and to Supposé que honest, I offrande’t think anyone reads longiligne reviews.(Except some of my nerdy goodread friends who then leave an equally baffling Proustian comment, which of excursion, takes quite a while to Supposé que properly understood.) So I will Commentaire a summary of some critical biases, ideas and psychological phenomenon that I found interesting.

This is a very fondamental compartiment of visual errements where we see two lines of same taillage appearing to be of varying lengths. Even after knowing that they are equal and the errements is created by the résultat attached to them, our system 1 still impulsively signals that one of them is longer then the other.

” And others closely resemble Nous another to the centre of redundancy. Ravissant a solid group of 100 or so biases ha been repeatedly shown to exist, and can make a hash of our direct.

In Kahneman's case those intuitions have been converted into theoretical proposition, each meticulously researched in well designed experiments. Clearly, this is at least Nous-mêmes difference between me and a Nobel Prize winning researcher.

Report this page